Published January 19, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review

  • 1. University of California, San Diego
  • 2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 3. University of California, San Francisco
  • 4. University of Chicago

Description

Importance: Social needs interventions aim to improve health outcomes and mitigate inequities by addressing health-related social needs, such as lack of transportation or food insecurity. However, it is not clear whether these studies are reducing racial or ethnic inequities.

Objective: To understand how studies of interventions addressing social needs among multiracial or multiethnic populations conceptualize and analyze differential intervention outcomes by race or ethnicity.

Evidence Review: Sources included a scoping review of systematic searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 1995, through November 29, 2021, expert suggestions, and hand searches of key citations. Eligible studies evaluated interventions addressing social needs; reported behavioral, health, or utilization outcomes or harms; and were conducted in multiracial or multiethnic populations. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full text for inclusion. The team developed a framework to assess whether the study was "conceptually thoughtful" for understanding root causes of racial health inequities (ie, noted that race or ethnicity are markers of exposure to racism) and whether analyses were "analytically informative" for advancing racial health equity research (ie, examined differential intervention impacts by race or ethnicity).

Findings: Of 152 studies conducted in multiracial or multiethnic populations, 44 studies included race or ethnicity in their analyses; of these, only 4 (9%) were conceptually thoughtful. Twenty-one studies (14%) were analytically informative. Seven of 21 analytically informative studies reported differences in outcomes by race or ethnicity, whereas 14 found no differences. Among the 7 that found differential outcomes, 4 found the interventions were associated with improved outcomes for minoritized racial or ethnic populations or reduced inequities between minoritized and White populations. No studies were powered to detect differences.

Conclusions and Relevance: In this review of a scoping review, studies of social needs interventions in multiracial or multiethnic populations were rarely conceptually thoughtful for understanding root causes of racial health inequities and infrequently conducted informative analyses on intervention effectiveness by race or ethnicity. Future work should use a theoretically sound conceptualization of how race (as a proxy for racism) affects social drivers of health and use this understanding to ensure social needs interventions benefit minoritized racial and ethnic groups facing social and structural barriers to health.

Data availability

See Supplement 2.

Files

cen_2023_oi_221442_1673451280.78972.pdf

Files (3.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:4407c0b8f59329a12777dc9d54554b1f
1.6 MB Preview Download
md5:c79a712bf356b7d525a51713cee68ae4
1.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50654
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:11243

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
IDIQ-TO#16-RTI-ENG-EVIDENCEMAP-07-26-2021

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Biological Sciences Division
Department(s)
Medicine
Center(s) or Institute(s)
Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics