Published May 15, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Can Discussions about Girls' Education Improve Academic Outcomes? Evidence from a Randomized Development Project

  • 1. Queen's University
  • 2. Carleton University
  • 3. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
  • 4. University of Chicago

Description

This article evaluates the impact that facilitated discussions about girls' education have on education outcomes for students in rural Zimbabwe. The staggered implementation of components of a randomized education project allowed for the causal analysis of a dialogue-based engagement campaign. This campaign involved regular discussions between trained facilitators and parents, teachers, and youth about girls' rights, the importance of attending school, and the barriers girls face in pursuing education. The campaigns increased mathematics performance and enrollment in the year after implementation. There was no similar improvement in literacy performance during this period. Longer-term data on the broader project suggest that adding additional education-focused interventions did not further increase mathematics performance and enrollment beyond what can be attributable to the dialogue campaigns alone.

Data availability

The authors do not have the right to share this data before the full data set is (eventually) made public by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO/UK Aid). Others can request access to the data from either World Vision UK or the UK FCDO.

Files

Can-Discussions-about-Girls-Education-Improve-Academic-Outcomes.pdf

Files (1.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:fc9ac927651b2973928b106db9a379af
680.7 kB Preview Download
Supplementary data
md5:363fb1cebf3730d468ab05945de5331f
925.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/wber/lhae021
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:11815

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Social Sciences Division
Department(s)
Kenneth C. Griffin Department of Economics