Published May 15, 2024
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Can Discussions about Girls' Education Improve Academic Outcomes? Evidence from a Randomized Development Project
- 1. Queen's University
- 2. Carleton University
- 3. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
- 4. University of Chicago
Description
This article evaluates the impact that facilitated discussions about girls' education have on education outcomes for students in rural Zimbabwe. The staggered implementation of components of a randomized education project allowed for the causal analysis of a dialogue-based engagement campaign. This campaign involved regular discussions between trained facilitators and parents, teachers, and youth about girls' rights, the importance of attending school, and the barriers girls face in pursuing education. The campaigns increased mathematics performance and enrollment in the year after implementation. There was no similar improvement in literacy performance during this period. Longer-term data on the broader project suggest that adding additional education-focused interventions did not further increase mathematics performance and enrollment beyond what can be attributable to the dialogue campaigns alone.
Data availability
The authors do not have the right to share this data before the full data set is (eventually) made public by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO/UK Aid). Others can request access to the data from either World Vision UK or the UK FCDO.Files
Can-Discussions-about-Girls-Education-Improve-Academic-Outcomes.pdf
Files
(1.6 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
Article md5:fc9ac927651b2973928b106db9a379af |
680.7 kB | Preview Download |
|
Supplementary data md5:363fb1cebf3730d468ab05945de5331f |
925.1 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1093/wber/lhae021
- Other
- oai:uchicago.tind.io:11815