Published July 11, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

From Small to Mega: Evaluating Urban Scale

  • 1. University of Chicago

Description

Scale is a significant although understudied dimension of cities. To better understand scale and flesh out the range of issues and debates involved in its conception, we conducted thirty-three in-depth interviews with a wide range of urban actors: developers, planners, policymakers, leaders of non-profit community organizations, and scholars. We wanted to know how contemporary urban actors in the U.S. conceive of scale as a factor in development? How is "small-scale" vs. "large-" or "mega-scale" differentiated, and are they inter-related? What are the pros and cons of both small- vs. large-scale projects? Four themes emerged from our interviews: scale definition, barriers to small-scale development, scale evaluation, and solutions for overcoming barriers to small-scale development. The point of this survey was to better understand possible responses and attitudes about scale among those involved in the urban development process.

Data availability

The survey data presented in this article is not readily available because of privacy restrictions.

Files

From-Small-to-Mega.pdf

Files (212.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:eea977da5ad89d1922ce3b17f949a4bd
212.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.3390/urbansci8030084
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:12808

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Social Sciences Division
Center(s) or Institute(s)
Urban Labs