Published March 4, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010

  • 1. University of Chicago
  • 2. University of Pittsburgh
  • 3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Description

Background: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies.

Methods: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-sectional data from 2001 through 2010 to examine direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) (Kantar Media) and provider-targeted promotion (IMS Health and SDI), including: (1) inflation-adjusted total promotion spending ($ and percent of sales); (2) distribution by channel (consumer v. provider); and (3) provider specialty both for the industry as a whole and for top-selling biologic and small molecule therapies.

Results: Total promotion peaked in 2004 at 36.1 billion USD (13.4% of sales). By 2010 it had declined to 27.7B USD (9.0% of sales). Between 2006 and 2010, similar declines were seen for promotion to providers and DTCA (both by 25%). DTCA's share of total promotion increased from 12% in 2002 to 18% in 2006, but then declined to 16% and remains highly concentrated. Number of products promoted to providers peaked in 2004 at over 3000, and then declined 20% by 2010. In contrast to top-selling small molecule therapies having an average of 370 million USD(8.8% of sales) spent on promotion, top biologics were promoted less, with only 33 million USD (1.4% of sales) spent per product. Little change occurred in the composition of promotion between primary care physicians and specialists from 2001–2010.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies have reduced promotion following changes in the pharmaceutical pipeline and patent expiry for several blockbuster drugs. Promotional strategies for biologic drugs differ substantially from small molecule therapies.

Files

journal.pone.0055504.pdf

Files (303.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:bab5936612cf637ae65744fd2579706d
303.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0055504
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:8804

Funding

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
RO1 HS0189960

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Biological Sciences Division
Department(s)
Medicine