Published February 26, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Exploring uncertainties in global crop yield projections in a large ensemble of crop models and CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate scenarios

  • 1. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
  • 2. University of Chicago
  • 3. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
  • 4. Met Office Hadley Centre
  • 5. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
  • 6. Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique
  • 7. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • 8. University of Maryland
  • 9. China Agricultural University
  • 10. Lund University

Description

Concerns over climate change are motivated in large part because of their impact on human society. Assessing the effect of that uncertainty on specific potential impacts is demanding, since it requires a systematic survey over both climate and impacts models. We provide a comprehensive evaluation of uncertainty in projected crop yields for maize, spring and winter wheat, rice, and soybean, using a suite of nine crop models and up to 45 CMIP5 and 34 CMIP6 climate projections for three different forcing scenarios. To make this task computationally tractable, we use a new set of statistical crop model emulators. We find that climate and crop models contribute about equally to overall uncertainty. While the ranges of yield uncertainties under CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections are similar, median impact in aggregate total caloric production is typically more negative for the CMIP6 projections (+1% to −19%) than for CMIP5 (+5% to −13%). In the first half of the 21st century and for individual crops is the spread across crop models typically wider than that across climate models, but we find distinct differences between crops: globally, wheat and maize uncertainties are dominated by the crop models, but soybean and rice are more sensitive to the climate projections. Climate models with very similar global mean warming can lead to very different aggregate impacts so that climate model uncertainties remain a significant contributor to agricultural impacts uncertainty. These results show the utility of large-ensemble methods that allow comprehensively evaluating factors affecting crop yields or other impacts under climate change. The crop model ensemble used here is unbalanced and pulls the assumption that all projections are equally plausible into question. Better methods for consistent model testing, also at the level of individual processes, will have to be developed and applied by the crop modeling community.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at the following URL/DOI: (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4321276).

Files

Müller_2021_Environ._Res._Lett._16_034040.pdf

Files (6.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
Supplementary data
md5:6c341292af0b034d575b5f3e17a56e89
3.2 MB Preview Download
Article
md5:17a9d45657903d7bbcfc8b77a98ddad0
3.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/1748-9326/abd8fc
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:13979

Funding

National Science Foundation
DGE-1735359
National Science Foundation
DGE-1746045
National Science Foundation
SES-1463644
NASA Co-op
Open Philanthropy Project
NASA GISS Climate Impacts Group
NASA Earth Sciences Directorate
Newton Fund
Leibniz Association
Open Access Fund

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Physical Sciences Division
Department(s)
Geophysical Sciences
Center(s) or Institute(s)
Center for Robust Decision Making on Climate and Energy Policy