Practical considerations for measuring the effective reproductive number, Rt
Creators
-
Gostic, Katelyn M.1
- McGough, Lauren1
- Baskerville, Edward B.1
- Abbott, Sam2
-
Joshi, Keya3
-
Tedijanto, Christine3
-
Kahn, Rebecca3
-
Niehus, Rene3
-
Hay, James A.3
-
De Salazar, Pablo M.3
-
Hellewell, Joel2
- Meakin, Sophie2
-
Munday, James D.2
-
Bosse, Nikos I.2
-
Sherrat, Katharine2
-
Thompson, Robin N.2
-
White, Laura F.4
-
Huisman, Jana S.5
-
Scire, Jérémie5
- Bonhoeffer, Sebastian5
-
Stadler, Tanja5
-
Wallinga, Jacco6
-
Funk, Sebastian2
-
Lipsitch, Marc3
-
Cobey, Sarah1
- 1. University of Chicago
- 2. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
- 3. Harvard University
- 4. Boston University
- 5. ETH Zürich
- 6. Leiden University
Description
Estimation of the effective reproductive number Rt is important for detecting changes in disease transmission over time. During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, policy makers and public health officials are using Rt to assess the effectiveness of interventions and to inform policy. However, estimation of Rt from available data presents several challenges, with critical implications for the interpretation of the course of the pandemic. The purpose of this document is to summarize these challenges, illustrate them with examples from synthetic data, and, where possible, make recommendations. For near real-time estimation of Rt, we recommend the approach of Cori and colleagues, which uses data from before time t and empirical estimates of the distribution of time between infections. Methods that require data from after time t, such as Wallinga and Teunis, are conceptually and methodologically less suited for near real-time estimation, but may be appropriate for retrospective analyses of how individuals infected at different time points contributed to the spread. We advise caution when using methods derived from the approach of Bettencourt and Ribeiro, as the resulting Rt estimates may be biased if the underlying structural assumptions are not met. Two key challenges common to all approaches are accurate specification of the generation interval and reconstruction of the time series of new infections from observations occurring long after the moment of transmission. Naive approaches for dealing with observation delays, such as subtracting delays sampled from a distribution, can introduce bias. We provide suggestions for how to mitigate this and other technical challenges and highlight open problems in Rt estimation.
Files
journal.pcbi.1008409.pdf
Files
(2.9 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
Article md5:04d47232ef76c9524d9258d644bb37de |
2.0 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:dc4439ba8021f0be99bd9245d20565f7
|
864.1 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008409
- Other
- oai:uchicago.tind.io:6207
Funding
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- F32GM134721
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- Morris-Singer Fund and from Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study cooperative agreement
- National Institutes of Health
- R01 GM122876
- Wellcome Trust
- 210758/Z/18/Z
- Christ Church
- Junior Research Fellowship
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- HHSN272201400005C