Published December 5, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A conceptual framework for assessing implementation strategy integrity

  • 1. University of Wisconsin–Madison
  • 2. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • 3. University of Rhode Island
  • 4. Temple University
  • 5. Friends Research Institute
  • 6. Chestnut Health Systems
  • 7. Indiana University
  • 8. Baystate Health
  • 9. Texas Christian University
  • 10. The Ohio State University
  • 11. University of Chicago
  • 12. New York State Psychiatric Institute

Description

Background: The outcomes of planned implementation efforts have been mixed, with some applications failing to achieve the desired change or impact. While reasons for mixed findings in implementation research are multifaceted (e.g., Damschroder et al., 2009, 2022), how the implementation strategy (IS) was deployed (i.e., integrity) and its impact on the implementation outcomes of evidence-based innovations (EBIs) is under-studied and warrants further clarification.

Method: This article builds on the IS fidelity and mechanisms of change literature to create the Implementation Strategy Integrity Framework (ISIF). The ISIF was developed by a set of implementation science researchers in the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network seeking to document the role of implementation strategies in influencing EBI outcomes.

Results: The authors identified four areas of documentation and measurement to examine the role of IS integrity on EBI outcomes. (a) Implementation Strategy Rigor (i.e., adherence, dose, and quality) requires those implementing the strategy/strategies to specify them, document adherence to the planned strategies, quality of execution, and any adaptations made. (b) Target User Responsiveness documents the extent and quality of targeted users' participation in IS activities and how well the target users perform their roles in conducting actions intended by the implementation strategies. (c) Target Mechanism Activation notes to what degree the implementation strategies achieved the intended impact(s) on targeted factors that facilitate EBI use. Finally, (d) these three areas are combined with selected Inner and Outer Context variables to explain IS integrity's potential moderating and mediating effects on EBI outcomes.

Conclusions: A framework that can define the integrity of an IS and allow for its subsequent use as an explanatory variable in EBI outcomes is necessary for better elucidating mechanisms of action. The ISIF offers a structured approach to operationalize, measure, and evaluate the application and related impacts of implementation strategies.

Files

Conceptual-framework-for-assessing-implementation-strategy-integrity.pdf

Files (782.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:35db49e7354d59625a3f47560aa91fe5
757.0 kB Preview Download
md5:3c3b36ea12f85845b99c91884de58218
25.0 kB Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/26334895241297278
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:14238

Funding

National Institute on Drug Abuse
U2CDA050097
National Institute on Drug Abuse
U01DA050442
National Institute on Drug Abuse
UG1DA050077
National Institute on Drug Abuse
UG1DA050070
National Institute on Drug Abuse
UG1DA050067
National Institute on Drug Abuse
UG1DA050074
National Institute on Drug Abuse
UG1DA050069
National Institute on Drug Abuse
UG1DA050065
National Institute on Drug Abuse
UG1DA050066
National Institute on Drug Abuse
UG1DA050071

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Department(s)
Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice Research Publications